Author: M.I. Kiose 1, A.V. Leonteva 1, O.V. Agafonova 2
Affiliation: 1Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2 Moscow State Linguistic University
Abstract:
The research addresses the pragmatic assertive act as a multimodal phenomenon displayed in spontaneous speech and gesture in expository communication. Methodologically, the study is carried out within the Multimodal Construction Grammar framework which considers multimodal construc-tions as two-side phenomena of form and function exposed in both modes. We hypothesize that ges-ture functions are aligned with the functions of assertion in speech, which adds to the pragmatic po-tential of expository communication. To verify the hypothesis, we use the compiled multimodal cor-pus where participants explain the differences between the notions with the idea of developing com-mon ground. Featuring palm-up open-hand gesture which is a frequently found recurrent gesture form in the compiled corpus (358 cases), we explore its functions – deictic, representational and pragmatic, aligned with the functional types of assertive act foregrounding evaluative and epistemic stance, nominative and predicative components in event construal (overall,
282 cases).
The results showed that while the most frequent assertive types are nomination and evalua-tion, pragmatic gesture functions prevail in exposing all assertion types. In multimodal nomination participants tend to enhance pragmaticity in foregrounding its discourse-structuring potential using a gesture with a concomitant function. Additionally, they frequently employ a two-hand gesture, where the other hand performs a deictic pointing function. In multimodal evaluation the partici-pants more commonly single out the referent using the discourse representational function in ges-ture. In epistemic multimodal construal they frequently adhere to the contact-establishing pragmatic gestures, which evidences of higher intersubjectivity in transferring epistemic ideas. In foreground-ing a predicative component in speech, no specific gesture functions are attributed to it, which means that it serves a prototype assertive pattern.
Therefore, four multimodal patterns of assertive construction were revealed with major dif-ferences in gesture functioning displayed in their discourse structuring, discourse representational, deictic and contact-establishing potential. The results contribute to further development of Multi-modal Construction Grammar framework to exploring pragmatic phenomena; additionally, they support the idea of speech and gesture adaptation in enhancing discourse pragmatization in commu-nication.
Keywords: : multimodal construction grammar, assertion, palm-up open hand gesture, discourse pragmatization, expository communication, speech and gesture adaptation
References: Austin J.L. How to do Things with Words, 2nd edition / J.O. Urmson, M. Sbisá (eds.). Cam-bridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962. Bavelas J., Holtgraves T.M., Gerwing J., Healing S. Hand and facial gestures in conversa-tional interaction / T.M. Holtgraves (Ed.) // The Oxford handbook of language and social psy-chology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. P. 111-130. Bergen B., Chang N. Embodied Construc-tion Grammar in simulation-based language un-derstanding / Östman J.-O., Fried M. (eds.) // Con-struction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and the-oretical extensions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2005. P. 147-190. Bressem J., Müller C. The “Negative-Assessment-Construction” – A multimodal pattern based on a recurrent gesture? // Linguistics Van-guard. 2014. Vol. 3(1). Article number: 20160053. Cienki A. Utterance Construction Grammar (UCxG) and the variable multimodality of con-structions // Linguistics Vanguard. 2017. Vol. 3. Article number: 20160048. Cienki A. Gesture and pragmatics / A. Bar-ron, Y. Gu, G. Steen (eds.) // The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics. N.Y., NY: Routledge, 2017. P. 61-68. Cienki A. From the finger lift to the palm-up open hand when presenting a point: A methodo-logical exploration of forms and functions // Lan-guages and Modalities. 2021. Vol. 1. P. 17-30. Cienki A., Müller C. Metaphor, gesture, and thought / R.W. Gibbs, Jr. (ed.) // The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. P. 483-501. Clift R. Stability and visibility in embodi-ment: The ‘Palm Up’ in interaction // Journal of Pragmatics. 2020. Vol. 169. P. 190-205. Cooperrider K., Abner N., Goldin-Meadow S. The palm-up puzzle: Meanings and origins of a widespread form in gesture and sign // Frontiers in Communication. 2018. Vol. 3 (23). P. 1-16. Croft W. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Ox-ford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Debreslioska S. Representing discourse ref-erents in speech and gesture. PhD Thesis. S. Lund, Sweden: Lund University, 2019. Ferré G. Functions of three open-palm hand gestures // Journal of Multimodal Communication. 2012. Vol. 1 (1). 1. P. 5-20. Fillmore Ch., Michaelis L.A., Kay P. Con-struction Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2003. Fried M., Östman J.-O. (eds.). Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective. Am-sterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2004. Givens D.B. Reading palm-up signs: Neuro-semiotic overview of a common hand gesture // Semiotica. 2016. Vol. 210. P. 235-250. Goldberg A.E. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Ox-ford University Press, 2006. Green M. Assertion // Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. Accessed at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935314.013.8 Green M. Assertions / M. Sbisà, K. Turner (Eds.) // Handbook of Pragmatics. Vol. II: Prag-matics of Speech Actions. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton, 2019. P. 387-410. Hassemer J., McCleary L. The multidimen-sionality of pointing // Gesture. 2018. Vol. 17 (3). P. 417-463. Hoffmann Th. Multimodal Construction Grammar: From multimodal constructs to multi-modal constructions / Xu Wen, R. John (eds.) // The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics. N.Y.: Routledge, 2021. P. 78-92. Inbar A., Maschler Y. Shared knowledge as an account for disaffiliative moves: Hebrew ki ‘because’ clauses accompanied by the palm-up open-hand gesture // Research on Language and Social Interaction. 2023. Vol. 56 (2). P. 141-164. Iriskhanova O.K., Nikolayeva A.I. Cognitive basis for the variation of recurrent gestures in ex-planatory discourse: Palm-up-open-hand and palm-down-open-hand gestures // Voprosy Kogni-tivnoy Lingvistiki. 2023. No. 4. P. 26-34. Kendon A. Pragmatic functions of gestures: Some observations on the history of their study and their nature // Gesture. 2017. Vol. 16 (2). P. 157-175. Kiose M.I., Leonteva A.V., Agafonova O.V., Petrov A.A. Cognitive-pragmatic motivation of recurrent contact-establishing gestures in multi-modal dialogue // Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvisti-ki. 2024. No. 4. P. 74-90. Kiose M.I., Leonteva A.V., Agafonova O.V., Petrov A.A. Mimetic schemas in multimodal con-tact-establishing communication // Research Re-sult. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. 2024. Vol. 10 (2). P. 46–70. Kok K., Bergmann K., Cienki A., Kopp S. Mapping out the multifunctionality of speakers’ gestures // Gesture. 2015. Vol. 15. P. 37-59. Ladewig S.H. Recurrent gestures / C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S.H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, J. Bressem (Eds.) // Body–Language–Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Ber-lin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013. P. 1558-1574. Langacker R.W. Foundations of cognitive grammar Volume I. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1987. Langacker R. Cognitive (Construction) Grammar // Cognitive Linguistics. 2009. Vol. 20(1). P. 167-176. Mangelschots K., Schoonjans S. Multimoda-le Evidentheitsmarkierung im Deutschen Eine Analyse verbaler und gestischer Ausdrucksformen und ihrer Kookkurrenzen // Linguistik Online. 2017. Vol. 81 (2). P. 95-125. MacFarlane J. What Is Assertion? / J. Brown, H. Cappelen (Eds.) // Assertion: New Phil-osophical Essays. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press, 2011. P. 79-96. Maricchiolo F., Gnisci A., Cerasuolo M., Ficca G., Bonaiuto M. Speaker’s hand gestures can modulate receiver’s negative reactions to a disagreeable verbal message / A. Esposito, L.C. Jain (eds.) // Toward robotic socially believable behaving systems. Vol. I. Cham: Springer Interna-tional Publishing, 2016. Vol. 105. P. 133-146. Marrese O.H., Raymond C.W., Fox B.A., Ford C.E., Pielke M. The Grammar of obvious-ness: The palm-up gesture in argument sequences // Frontiers in Communication. 2021. Vol. 6. Arti-cle number: 663067. Müller C. How recurrent gestures mean: Conventionalized contexts-of-use and embodied motivation // Gesture. 2017. Vol. 16 (2). P. 277-304. Müller C., Bressem J., Ladewig S.H. To-wards a grammar of gesture: A form-based view / C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S.H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, S. Teßendorf //An international hand-book on multimodality in human interaction. Ber-lin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013. P. 707-733. Prokofyeva O., Kiose M., Leonteva A., Smirnova E. Intensity and its manifestations in speech and recurrent gestures in spontaneous dia-logue // Computational linguistics and intellectual technologies. 2015. Vol. 23. P. 281-290. Roseano P., González M., Borràs-Comes J., Prieto P. Communicating epistemic stance: How speech and gesture patterns reflect epistemicity and evidentiality // Discourse Processes. 2016. Vol. 53 (3). P. 135-174. Searle J. Speech acts: an essay in the phi-losophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press, 1969. Steen G., Turner M. Multimodal Construc-tion Grammar / M. Borkent, B. Dancygier, J. Hin-nell (eds.) // Language and the creative mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. P. 255-274. Talley L., Temple S. How leaders influence followers through the use of nonverbal communi-cation // Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 2015. Vol. 36 (1). P. 69-80. Uhrig P. Hand gestures with verbs of throw-ing: Collostructions, style and metaphor // Year-book of the German Cognitive Linguistics Associ-ation. 2022. Vol. 10 (1). P. 99-120. Wu S. Multimodality of transitive, intransi-tive and copular constructions in spoken language // Linguistics and Literature Studies. 2019. Vol. 7. P. 241-249. Wu S., Cienki A. Transitivity, events, and gesture: The Case of the causative-inchoative al-ternation // Open Linguistics. 2019. Vol. 5. P. 311-331. Vincze L., Poggi I. Multimodal signals of high commitment in expert-to-expert contexts // Discourse & Communication. 2022. Vol. 16 (6). P. 693-715. Zima E., Bergs A. Multimodality and con-struction grammar // Linguistics Vanguard. 2017. Vol. 3 (1). Article number: 20161006.
For citation: Kiose, M. I., Leonteva, A. V., & Agafonova, O. V. (2025). Multimodal grammar of assertive construction: a case of palm-up open-hand gesture in expository communication. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 4, 57-68.
Pages: 57-68