Author: D.B. Izmailyan
Affiliation: Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
Abstract:
The major objective of this case study is to discursively assess the UK press coverage of the economic climate in Russia in the early stages of the geopolitical crisis of 2014-15. The empirical material constituting a 730-thousand-word corpus derives from UK national newspapers and the Financial Times online archive.
Applying techniques of corpus-assisted discourse studies, an inductive framing analysis seeks to detect the underlying cultural frames employed by British journalists to construct news content about Russian economy and invite readers to interpret the news in a particular way. The methodological approach consists of successive analytical stages that involve moving back and forth between quantitative and qualitative techniques of analysis that lead to the emergence of conceptual categories, or frames.
The analysis produced four dominant frames and two alternative counter-frames, all of which are logically formed in clusters of framing and reasoning devices and integrated in a frame matrix. Each cluster in the matrix conveys a coherent overarching idea that represents the frame. The inventory is represented through a broader cultural scenario of a classic fairy tale in which a villain, victim, hero, friends and foes interact in the context of crime and punishment. The dominant scenario reinforces the negative image of Russian economy by portraying Russia as a villain bearing moral and financial responsibility for its aggressive behavior.
The alternative scenario invalidates the dominant frames by crediting Russia with political and economic virtues. It is then suggested that a more resolute use of counter-frames in communication about the Russian case might mitigate the negative image of Russia in the British news media. The findings also demonstrate that corpus linguistic techniques integrated in a qualitative framing analysis can lead to a more reliable identification of loci for both privileged and unprivileged discourses, thereby providing evidence for both popular and unpopular forms of understanding the issue or topic covered in the media.
Keywords:
frame, framing analysis, corpus-assisted discourse studies, news media, UK press, Russian economy.
References:
Anthony L. AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University, 2019. URL: https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/releases/
Baker P., Egbert J. (eds.). Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus-linguistic research. N.Y.: Routledge, 2016.
Bartlett F. C. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press, 1932.
D’Angelo P. News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication 52 (4), 2002. P. 870-888.
Entman R. M. Projections of power. Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. University of Chicago Press, 2004.
Gamson W. A., Modigliani A. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology 95(1), 1989. P. 1-37.
Goffman E., Lemert C. (ed.), Branaman A. (ed.). The Goffman reader. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell, 1997.
Hall S. The work of representation // Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices, 2nd edition / Hall S., Evans J., Nixon S. (eds.). London: Sage, 2013. P. 13-64.
Kitzinger J. Framing and frame analysis // Media studies: Key issues and debates / Devereux E. (ed.). London: Sage, 2007. P. 134-161.
Kolmer C., Semetko H.A. Framing the Iraq war: perspectives from American, UK, Czech, German, South African, and Al-Jazeera news. American behavioral scientist 52(5), 2009. P. 643-656.
Lakoff G. Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think, Third edition. University of Chicago Press, 2016.
Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live by. University of Chicago Press, 2003.
Macgilchrist F. Journalism and the Political: Discursive Tensions in news coverage of Russia. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011.
Matthes J., & Kohring M. The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication 58(2), 2008. P. 258-279.
Miller M. M. Frame mapping and analysis of news coverage of contentious issues. Social Science Computer Review 15(4), 1997. P. 367-378.
Partington A. Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast // Corpora and Discourse / Partington A., Morley J., Haarman L. (eds.). Bern: Peter Lang, 2004. P. 11-20.
Reese S. D. The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication 57(1), 2007. P. 148-154.
Scheufele D. T., Scheufele D. A. Of spreading activation, applicability and schemas: Conceptual distinctions and their operational implications for measuring frames and framing effects // Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives / D’Angelo P., Kuypers J. (eds.). N.Y.: Routledge, 2010. P. 110-134.
Scott M. WordSmith Tools (Version 8) [Computer Software]. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software, 2020. URL: https://www.lexically.net
Scott M., Tribble C. Textual Patterns: Key words and corpus analysis in language education. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2006.
Stubbs M. Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. N.Y.: Blackwell, 2001.
Swidler A. Culture in action: symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review 51(2), 1986. P. 273-286.
Tankard J. W. The empirical approach to the study of media framing // Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world / Reese S. D., Gandy O. H., Grant A. E. (eds.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2001. P. 95-106.
Touri M., Koteyko N. Using corpus linguistic software in the extraction of news frames: towards a dynamic process of frame analysis in journalistic texts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18(6), 2014. P. 601-616.
Van Gorp B., Vercruysse T. Frames and counter-frames giving meaning to dementia: A framing analysis of media content. Social Science & Medicine 74 (8), 2012. P. 1274-1281.
Измаилян Д.Б. Методологические возможности когнитивно-корпусного подхода к реконструкции фреймов в масс-медиа дискурсе // Когнитивные исследования языка. 2021. Вып. 3(46). С. 342-346. [Izmailyan D.B. Metodologicheskie vozmozhnosti kognitivno-korpusnogo podkhoda k rekonstruktsii freymov v mass-media diskurse // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. 2021. Vyp. 3(46). S. 342-346.]
Кочетова Л.А., Кононова И.В. Когнитивно-корпусный подход к анализу конструирования ценностных смыслов в рекламном дискурсе // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. 2019. № 2. С. 65-74. [Kochetova L.A., Kononova I.V. Kognitivno-korpusnyy podkhod k analizu konstruirovaniya tsennostnykh smyslov v reklamnom diskurse // Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki. 2019. № 2. S. 65-74.]
Чернявская В.Е. Дискурсивный̆ анализ и корпусные методы: необходимое доказательное звено? Объяснительные возможности качественного и количественного подходов // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. 2018. № 2. С. 34-37. [Chernyavskaya V.E. Diskursivnyy̆ analiz i korpusnye metody: neobkhodimoe dokazatel'noe zveno? Ob"yasnitel'nye vozmozhnosti kachestvennogo i kolichestvennogo podkhodov // Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki. 2018. № 2. S. 34-37.]
For citation: Izmailyan, D. B. (2023). The Image of Russian Economy in British Media: Using Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis in Extracting News Frames. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 2, 63-75 (In Russ.).
Pages: 63-75